Zalgorithm

Understanding Euler's number

Euler’s number (e ~= 2.718), possible definitions:

Based on the last definition in that list, I took a stab at defining e as “analog growth as opposed to digital or sampled growth”. (See the analog vs sampled section below.)

The compound interest formula

A=P(1+rn)nt A = P(1 + \frac{r}{n})^{nt}

Where:

Here’s a demonstration using the above formula that shows how e is what you get when you push compound growth to its absolute limit:

In [15]: P = 1
In [16]: r = 1
In [17]: n = 12

In [18]: P * (1 + (r/n))**n
Out[18]: 2.613035290224676

In [19]: n = 24

In [20]: P * (1 + (r/n))**n
Out[20]: 2.663731258068599

In [21]: n = 365

In [22]: P * (1 + (r/n))**n
Out[22]: 2.7145674820219727

In [23]: n = 3650

In [24]: P * (1 + (r/n))**n
Out[24]: 2.717909554576972

In [25]: n = 100000

In [26]: P * (1 + (r/n))**n
Out[26]: 2.7182682371922975 # approaching e

The mathematical definition of e

e=lim(ninf)(1+1n)n e = \lim(n \rightarrow \inf)(1 + \frac{1}{n})^n

Euler’s number as a representation of analog growth (speculative)

In the Python demo above, each value of n is like a different sampling rate for growth:

With this conception, the compound interest formula (1 + 1/n)^n is like a digital sampling of continuous growth. (maybe?)

Where natural growth occurs

The key is that these processes aren’t scheduled in the way that interest payments are.

Euler’s number in calculus

From Claude: when you see e^x in an equation, read it as “starting from 1, what do you get after x units of continuous growth?” When x = 1, you get e, when x = 2 you get e^2